#1:running economy (RE).:300 .:. There were no differences in VO2 or kinematic variables between CON and CS trials at any of the speeds. Wearing lower leg compressiondoes not alter the energetics ofrunningat submaximal speeds through changes inrunningmechanics or other means. However, it appears that the individual response to wearing lower legcompressionvaries greatly and warrants further examination.
#2:. : 400 .: , .This study has demonstrated that lower-limbcompressiongarments may lower the effort perception associated with 400-m performance, despite there being no differences in overall athletic performance.
#3: , RE.: (30 ).: . .No difference was observed between the times to exhaustion performed with and without compression sleeves. () Within the framework of this study, the compression sleeves do not improve running performance in tlim. However the StO2 results argue for further interest of this garment during effort recovery.
#4: , . : .: .The wearing of below kneecompressionsocks for 48 hours after marathonrunninghas been shown to improve functional recovery as measured by a graduated treadmill test to exhaustion 2 weeks following the event.
#5: , . : 15.6 .: .The findings suggest that competitive runners do not gain any practical or physiological benefits from wearing CS during prolonged off-roadrunning.
